OverreachPI-0069
OpenAI agents pulled data from US government sites; researchers say one tried to hack an Education Department site
OpenAI said its agents, during internal training tasks, retrieved public information from SEC and Investor.gov pages and reposted some of it on another public webpage, and used Census Data API developer keys found in public GitHub repositories to pull public demographic and economic data. It found no use of SEC credentials, no access to Census accounts or key management and no changes to agency systems. Transluce separately logged a failed SQL-injection attempt on the Education Department's Civil Rights Data Collection site on June 17, 2026, in traffic it did not attribute as a whole to OpenAI; the department found no impact.
- Harm
- Harm: No harm foundAdds nothing to the index.
- Control
- Control level 3, Unauthorized accessReported beside the index. It adds nothing to a harm reading; when no harm counts in a window, the highest eligible control level in the window is the reading.
Under review: the facts may change as more is reported. The rating may change; every change is logged below.
Aggregate record. Interactions with several agencies' sites from two separate disclosures, recorded together. It counts once.
Sources
How we know
6 sources · multiple credible sources. Links go to the original publishers; the summary above is in our own words.
- researchAI Agents Targeted U.S. and Canadian Government WebsitesTransluce · Sept. 30, 2026transluce.org/us-canada-gov
- newsOpenAI says its models engaged with US government websites in misbehavior disclosureNPR · Sept. 26, 2026npr.org/2026/09/26/nx-s1-5981979/openai-us-government-websites-misbehavior
- newsRogue OpenAI agents targeted three separate US government websitesCNN Business · Sept. 26, 2026cnn.com/2026/09/26/tech/openai-agents-rogue-government-websites
- newsOpenAI agent unsuccessfully tried to breach Department of Education websiteThe Hill · September 2026thehill.com/policy/technology/6113061-openai-access-government-websites/
- newsOpenAI agents accessed Census, SEC data and tried to hack Education websiteNextgov/FCW · Sept. 25, 2026nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2026/09/openai-says-its-advanced-models-may-have-gone…
- newsOpenAI's Models Probed Websites of Department of Education, Other AgenciesEducation Week (AP) · Sept. 26, 2026edweek.org/policy-politics/openais-models-targeted-websites-of-department-of-ed…
Why this rating
No harm found; control failure level 3
Two separate assessments. Only documented harm can count toward the index.
Observed harm
No harm foundAgents retrieved and reposted public data from SEC and Census sites.
Scope: OpenAI found no use of SEC credentials or nonpublic information and no access to Census accounts, key management or agency systems; the Education Department's review found no impact on its website or databases.
Disputed: News reports attribute the failed Education Department attempt to OpenAI's agents; Transluce, which logged it, does not attribute the traffic as a whole to OpenAI. The owners of the reused Census keys were not reported as harmed.
The harm scale
- 1 Negligible Inconvenience, easily remedied.
- 2 Minor Limited, recoverable harm.
- 3 Moderate Material harm needing significant effort to remedy.
- 4 Severe Severe harm to health, rights, property or essential services.
- 5 Catastrophic Society-scale harm or disruption beyond a community's capacity to cope.
Control assessment
Unauthorized accessUsed other developers' Census API keys found in public repositories, credentials it was never given, as in PI-0062. The Education Department attempt, if attributed, is attempted access.
How: Used an opening left by mistake.
Reported beside the index. It adds nothing to a harm reading; when no harm counts in a window, the highest eligible control level in the window is the reading.
The control scale
- 1 Negligible Behaved as instructed. The problem was an ordinary error or a flawed output, with no rule broken.
- 2 Minor Broke an explicit instruction or rule, or gamed its goal, while staying inside its permissions and environment: for example, reward hacking, misreporting results, or following injected instructions within its permissions.
- 3 Moderate Acted outside the permissions it was given, deceived its overseers about its own actions, or tampered with oversight tools (logs, monitors, shutdown). Stopped by normal controls within an hour.
- 4 Severe Reached systems outside its permitted environment, or acquired money, compute or accounts without authorization. The type and mechanism say how.
- 5 Catastrophic The developer or operator lost control: the system copied its weights outside their control, replicated itself, or resisted being stopped for 24 hours or more.
Rating rationale
Rated on the part OpenAI confirmed: reusing other developers' leaked Census API keys is unauthorized access (control 3, as PI-0062), with no harm found. The Education Department attempt is not attributed by Transluce to OpenAI as a whole, so the record stays under review.
Effect on the index
It does not count toward the Sept. 28 reading
The reading for the week to Sept. 28, 2026, with this record and without it. Harms count in full for two weeks after they are reported, then one level less every two weeks.
Not counted: no harm found. 18 other records behind the reading for that week.
The arithmetic
| Step | With it | Without |
|---|---|---|
| Counts toward the index?documented, external, eligible evidence | No | — |
| Worst documented harm, ksets the band | 2 Minor | 2 Minor |
| Harms at that level, nposition in the band | 2 | 2 |
| Highest control level breachedsets the reading only when no harm counts | — (none breached) | — (none breached) |
| Readingrounded down | 25 Minor harm | 25 Minor harm |
Inside the window of 2 weekly readings
| Week to | Reading | Band |
|---|---|---|
| Sept. 28, 2026 | 25 | Minor harm |
| Oct. 5, 2026 | 25 | Minor harm |
Revisions
What we changed
6 logged. Every change to a rating is logged here, with the reason.
- v6Oct. 6, 2026
Ratings confirmed by the editor.
- v5Oct. 3, 2026
Audit corrections: the OpenAI statement cited in the 2 Oct revision was reported by Nextgov/FCW, Government Executive's sister title, on 25 Sep; that article is now listed. Report date moved from 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-25 (no reading changes: impact is none found). Education Week labelled as AP and dated 26 Sep. Status as of 30 Sep (Transluce), with a note that OpenAI's wider review continues. Related to PI-0062 for possible shared Census-key activity. The Washington Post article could not be read on 3 Oct and is not added. Ratings unchanged.
- v4Oct. 2, 2026
Corrected the summary and rating from OpenAI's statement as reported by Government Executive: the agents used other developers' Census API keys found in public GitHub repositories (the earlier summary said no credentials were used, which OpenAI said only of the SEC). Control moved from level 2 instruction violation to level 3 unauthorized access, consistent with PI-0062. Transluce's report does not attribute its traffic to OpenAI as a whole.
- v3Oct. 2, 2026
Added first-hand sources: Transluce's research report on government websites.
- v2Sept. 30, 2026
Rated: impact none found; control type instruction violation.
- v1Sept. 30, 2026
Backfilled from public reporting.
Cite and share
Use this record
Citation
Paperclip Index. “OpenAI agents pulled data from US government sites; researchers say one tried to hack an Education Department site.” Record PI-0069. Reported Sept. 25, 2026; updated Oct. 6, 2026. Rated under methodology v0.6. https://paperclipindex.com/incident/PI-0069