Hijacked by injectionPI-0039
Reprompt: a single click on a Copilot link let attackers keep steering a user's Copilot session
Varonis Threat Labs showed that instructions placed in the query parameter of a legitimate Microsoft Copilot link could take over the victim's Copilot Personal session after one click and keep it pulling and sending out personal data, even after the chat was closed. Copilot's leak protections applied only to the first request, so asking it to repeat each task bypassed them. Varonis reported it to Microsoft on Aug. 31, 2025; Microsoft had fixed it by the Jan. 14, 2026, disclosure, separately from its Patch Tuesday updates. Microsoft 365 Copilot for business was not affected.
- Harm
- Harm: No harm reportedAdds nothing to the index.
- Control
- Control level 2, Instruction violationReported beside the index. It adds nothing to a harm reading; when no harm counts in a window, the highest eligible control level in the window is the reading.
Near miss. Harm was plausible but prevented. It is rated only on what actually happened.
Sources
How we know
3 sources · developer confirmed. Links go to the original publishers; the summary above is in our own words.
- researchReprompt: The Single-Click Microsoft Copilot Attack that Silently Steals Your Personal DataVaronis · Jan. 14, 2026varonis.com/blog/reprompt
- newsReprompt attack let hackers hijack Microsoft Copilot sessionsBleepingComputer · Jan. 14, 2026bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/reprompt-attack-let-hackers-hijack-microsoft…
- newsHow 'Reprompt' Attack Let Hackers Steal Data From Microsoft CopilotTechRepublic · Jan. 19, 2026techrepublic.com/article/news-reprompt-attack-microsoft-copilot
Why this rating
No harm reported; control failure level 2
Two separate assessments. Only documented harm can count toward the index.
Observed harm
No harm reportedResearcher demonstration on controlled accounts; no victims reported.
Not a finding that no harm occurred.
The harm scale
- 1 Negligible Inconvenience, easily remedied.
- 2 Minor Limited, recoverable harm.
- 3 Moderate Material harm needing significant effort to remedy.
- 4 Severe Severe harm to health, rights, property or essential services.
- 5 Catastrophic Society-scale harm or disruption beyond a community's capacity to cope.
Control assessment
Instruction violationCopilot followed injected instructions and bypassed its own leak safeguard, but used only the user's own session access.
Reported beside the index. It adds nothing to a harm reading; when no harm counts in a window, the highest eligible control level in the window is the reading.
The control scale
- 1 Negligible Behaved as instructed. The problem was an ordinary error or a flawed output, with no rule broken.
- 2 Minor Broke an explicit instruction or rule, or gamed its goal, while staying inside its permissions and environment: for example, reward hacking, misreporting results, or following injected instructions within its permissions.
- 3 Moderate Acted outside the permissions it was given, deceived its overseers about its own actions, or tampered with oversight tools (logs, monitors, shutdown). Stopped by normal controls within an hour.
- 4 Severe Reached systems outside its permitted environment, or acquired money, compute or accounts without authorization. The type and mechanism say how.
- 5 Catastrophic The developer or operator lost control: the system copied its weights outside their control, replicated itself, or resisted being stopped for 24 hours or more.
Rating rationale
No external harm was reported from this controlled test. Control level 2 reflects following injected instructions within permissions and bypassing a safeguard without a permission breach.
Effect on the index
It does not count toward the Jan. 19 reading
The reading for the week to Jan. 19, 2026, with this record and without it. Harms count in full for two weeks after they are reported, then one level less every two weeks.
Not counted: no harm reported. 3 other records behind the reading for that week.
The arithmetic
| Step | With it | Without |
|---|---|---|
| Counts toward the index?documented, external, eligible evidence | No | — |
| Worst documented harm, ksets the band | — (none counting) | — (none counting) |
| Harms at that level, nposition in the band | 0 | 0 |
| Highest control level breachedsets the reading only when no harm counts | 4 | 4 |
| Readingrounded down | 4 Control failures only | 4 Control failures only |
Inside the window of 4 weekly readings
| Week to | Reading | Band |
|---|---|---|
| Jan. 19, 2026 | 4 | Control failures only |
| Jan. 26, 2026 | 4 | Control failures only |
| Feb. 2, 2026 | 2 | Control failures only |
| Feb. 9, 2026 | 6 | Negligible harm |
Revisions
What we changed
4 logged. Every change to a rating is logged here, with the reason.
- v4Oct. 6, 2026
Ratings confirmed by the editor.
- v3Oct. 3, 2026
Audit corrections. Event date moved from 2026-01 to 2025: Varonis disclosed the flaw to Microsoft on 31 Aug 2025, so the test predates that. The summary now says Microsoft fixed it by the 14 Jan 2026 disclosure, separately from Patch Tuesday (BleepingComputer's correction). Repaired the BleepingComputer URL, dated the sources (Varonis's page now shows only a June 2026 update date; TechRepublic's date is from the audit, as its page was not readable in the Oct 2026 check) and added a status note. Ratings unchanged.
- v2Sept. 30, 2026
Rated: impact not reported; control type instruction violation.
- v1Sept. 30, 2026
Backfilled from public reporting.
Cite and share
Use this record
Citation
Paperclip Index. “Reprompt: a single click on a Copilot link let attackers keep steering a user's Copilot session.” Record PI-0039. Reported Jan. 14, 2026; updated Oct. 6, 2026. Rated under methodology v0.6. https://paperclipindex.com/incident/PI-0039